clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

Pens-Habs Giveaways/Takeaways

New, comments

The Pittsburgh Penguins had the puck a lot more than Montreal did during their series, and Pittsburgh gave up the puck a lot more as a result:


Give Take
Pit 59 30
Mtl 43 29


I watched all of the scoring chances in this series, and I found that Pittsburgh made more bad defensive clears and giveaways that led directly to scoring chances than Montreal did, by a margin of 10-6.  So I was wondering if the official scorer recorded more defensive zone giveaways for the Pens.  Nope:


Pit Mtl
Off 27 18
Neu 7 3
Def 25 22


Offensive zone giveaways happen all the time, especially when you control the puck, so we can pretty safely ignore the difference there.  But defensive zone giveaways that led to chances were very close.


As you can see, the first 10 giveaways by each team are approximately in the same locations.  Pittsburgh then had a few more giveaways 40-50 feet from the goal, while Montreal had a few more just inside the blue line.  The expected goal differential resulting from the locations of those defensive zone giveaways is very small.

Here's something that surprised me - giveaways by zone when the score was tied:


Off Neu Def
Pit 3 2 5
Mtl 11 1 11


If that looks like a team bearing down and committing fewer mental errors in close games, you could have fooled me.  But what we also see is Pittsburgh making an extreme number of turnovers when they were trailing in the game:


Off Neu Def
Pit 11 4 10
Mtl 1 1 3


That looks like Pittsburgh digging a hole for themselves when they were down.  For completeness, here's the same data for Pittsburgh leading:


Off Neu Def
Pit 13 1 10
Mtl 6 1 8


So Pittsburgh didn't do themselves any favors when they were losing...And Montreal didn't do themselves any favors when the game was close.  If Montreal was winning, their giveaways made them more likely to continue winning; but if the game was tied, they were more likely to get behind.  Giveaways are not what decided this series.