Pilots Logbook 2013-14: Paul Postma

Jerome Miron-USA TODAY Sports

The Winnipeg Jets 2013-14 season has been laid to rest. This series will take an in-depth look how the team and its players have performed, and some decisions that could push the Jets forward in the future.

Paul Postma's shortened season is tough to gauge by the numbers. From the start Postma struggled to find a rhythm. He was in and out of the lineup early. In October he played the opening two games, then sat three, then played two, then sat one, then played four. Then news came out with a blood clot and he was shutdown until February.

The Basics

GP G A P TOI/GP S/60 Sh% PenD
20 1 2 3 15.7 3.5 5.3 -1

Numbers are for all minutes.

Postma just made the games played threshold to be evaluated in the Pilot's Logbook series, with the cutoff being at twenty games. His counting statistics are low, especially for someone considered an offensive defenseman. His points relative to ice time was 6th, falling behind Dustin Byfuglien, Jacob Trouba, Grant Clitsome, Tobias Enstrom and Mark Stuart(!). However, Postma did this with a 5.5 on-ice shooting percentage, which is about 2.4 less than what the average third pair defenseman experiences.



Player usage chart from extraskater.com.

EV Percentage of Team's Available TOI 5 on 5
57.10% 5.4% 29.60% 14.20% 6.00% 27.40% 26.30%
2nd 2nd 7th 6th 8th 8th 8th

Rankings are given for team out of 9 defensemen to play 20 or more games.

Paul Postma was given a huge offensive zone push against weaker competition, this is idea when a coach wants to optimize a player with Postma's strengths and weaknesses. On the other hand, Postma's quality of teammates and power play time were less than optimal. Postma played with the Jets top players less often than any defender not named Adam Pardy. This probably played a major role in Postma's low on-ice shooting percentage. Postma also placed 6th in power play ice time, an odd usage choice given that Postma is essentially a power play specialist and has the Jets second best 5v4 points per minute.

Underlying Numbers


The y-axis is given to show the typical 40-60 sustainable spread seen for NHL calibre players. Players are compared to particular line/pair depending on 5v5 TOI per game. Population mean (average), median (50th percentile), and other percentiles are relative to player performance between 2007-12.

5v5 TOI Corsi% relCorsi% dCF/20 dCA/20 dCorsi%

RelCorsi is team's percentage of shot attempts with player on ice minus shot attempts with player off ice. Delta Corsi values are team's shot attempt rates with player on ice, but relative to league norm given similar usage (quality of teammates, quality opponents, zone starts, and TOI). dCF/20 is shot attempts for -where a positive number is above average-, dCA/20 is shot attempts against -where a negative number is above average-, and dCorsi% is percentage of shot attempts.

Postma's underlying numbers were all over the place on the graph. From terrible, to exceptional, and then settling to below average. Of course, even the fanciest of stats need sufficient sample size.

To give a more realistic picture of Postma's abilities we can look at both of his seasons combined:


From here we see what we would expect: when Postma is given an offensive zone push against the other team's weaker lines, the Jets out-shoot their opponents at an impressive margin. Sounds familiar? Like a certain Grant Clitsome?


Paul Postma is a good power play defenseman that wasn't used on the power play. He suffered through injuries and inconsistencies, which led to him only playing twenty games.

Keep or lose?

Paul Postma and Grant Clitsome are two defenseman that can excel given cushy minutes in the offensive zone. Unfortunately though the Jets do not have to many soft minutes to give out with the only having three legitimate top 4 defenseman (well four if you count Byfuglien and force someone on their offside).

Bonus: Clitty-Post

As mentioned earlier, it was noted that Postma and Clitsome are similar players, in where they can play relatively big minutes for a 3rd pair, as long as they get a decent offensive zone push. When the Jets have had the two together, they Jets have directed 53.3% which put's them in the top 20% of 3rd pair defenders. On average, that Corsi% gives a team a +3 goal differential better than an average third pair (or about +12 better than the bottom 5%).

Essentially, the two are an optimal third pair. The problem is the Jets bottom pair depth is starting to become log-jammed - and it may be for a while now that Clitsome and Stuart have been extended. This is why I believe the Jets should have let Stuart walk.

All numbers are from Extra Skater, Behind the Net and Hockey Analysis

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Arctic Ice Hockey

You must be a member of Arctic Ice Hockey to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Arctic Ice Hockey. You should read them.

Join Arctic Ice Hockey

You must be a member of Arctic Ice Hockey to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Arctic Ice Hockey. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.