Playoff Preview: Chicago-Vancouver

VANCOUVER, CANADA - MAY 5: Henrik Sedin #33 of the Vancouver Canucks is hit by Dave Bolland #36 of the Chicago Blackhawks during the first period in Game Three of the Western Conference Semifinals during the 2010 NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs on May 5, 2010 at General Motors Place in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. (Photo by Rich Lam/Getty Images)

 

If you surf around looking for odds, you'll find some crazy things - like Vancouver at 4-3 to win the Western Conference, while Chicago's 12-1.  I'm sorry to say, those lines are just made up.  One of our frequent readers noted the implied team strength of recent betting lines at Pinnacle yesterday:

 

 

Team Avg Team Strength
Vancouver 0.6053
Chicago 0.5966
San Jose
0.5932
Detroit 0.5773
Los Angeles 0.5529
Phoenix 0.5282
Nashville 0.5255
Anaheim 0.5167

 

So, other than the ridiculous futures market, people seem to think that Chicago's not that much worse than Vancouver.  Are they justified in thinking so?

If we look at shot differential - aka Fenwick - it certainly seems that way:

 

Team Fenwick %, Score Tied
PIT 54.4
CHI 54.1
VAN 53.9
SJ 53.7
DET 53.5
NJ 53.3
MON 52.6
TB 52.4

 

Any surprises there?  New Jersey?  Montreal?  I digress.  Chicago and Vancouver were equally good at controlling the play this season when the game was on the line.  In fact, it's surprising that the implied team strength is any different between the two teams.  Is it a special teams issue?

 

TEAM % Opps % TOI PPO TOIPP TOI/Opp PKO TOIPK TOI/Opp
VAN 51.6 46.8 295 459.0 1.56 277 522.6 1.89
CHI 52.1 51.3 277 444.4 1.60 255 421.9 1.65

 

Doesn't seem like it.  Vancouver spent proportionally more time on special teams (both PP and PK) than Chicago did, but the only real difference is the efficiency of Vancouver's PK.  Looking at the shot totals at 5-on-4 and 4-on-5, we see a slight advantage for the Canucks:

 

TEAM GF SF GF/60 SF/60 SPCT
VAN 69 415 9.3 56.0 834
CHI 60 365 8.3 50.8 836
GA SA GA/60 SA/60 SPCT
VAN 39 413 4.7 50.2 906
CHI 49 365 7.2 53.6 866

 

The main difference here is goaltending, which we can see pretty clearly from "PDO" numbers:

 

TEAM % of Shots PDO
VAN 50.1 1072
CHI 50.0 1030

 

At even-strength, Vancouver was a 1019 PDO team this season, while Chicago was 1001, so the 42-point gap on special teams is almost certainly much greater than the true-talent gap.  We don't expect to see something  like this continue.

So when we get down to it, Vancouver has two advantages in this series:

1. Luongo vs Crawford in goal

2. Home-Ice Advantage

And yet Vancouver is coming up somewhere around a 75% favorite in the futures markets to beat Chicago in the opening round.  55% I could see, but 75% is just a massive overestimate of Vancouver's talent, and - likely moreso - a massive underestimate of Chicago's talent.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Arctic Ice Hockey

You must be a member of Arctic Ice Hockey to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Arctic Ice Hockey. You should read them.

Join Arctic Ice Hockey

You must be a member of Arctic Ice Hockey to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Arctic Ice Hockey. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9355_tracker