Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Seahawks Trade for TE Kellen Winslow

Shanahan's Implicit Message: Become a Better Hitter

NEW YORK  NY - JANUARY 13: Keith Ballard #4 of the Vancouver Canucks hip checks Ruslan Fedotenko #19 of the New York Rangers during the game at Madison Square Garden on January 13 2011 in New York City. (Photo by Andy Marlin/Getty Images)

Now I don't expect Brendan Shanahan to say this; he has a history of being a pretty hard-nosed player himself, so I suspect any allusions he might make to not targeting the head or not hitting high would be viewed as hypocritical.  Regardless, there was a key moment in his statement regarding the Brad Boyes suspension Sunday (bold and italics are my own):

While the play develops quickly, Colborne makes no sudden movements just prior to, or simultaneous with, the hit; placing the onus on Boyes not to hit him in the head.  While I believe Boyes' assertion that he did not intentionally target the head, this is a reckless hit and is now illegal.

In other words, as the hitter, you need to be responsible for the direction of your hit.  I think there's a hidden message to NHL players, too: become better hitters.  Let me explain...

Star-divide

When I was growing up, I learned a lot about physics without really knowing it.  As a smaller defenceman, I had a deep admiration for the hip check, not only for the ability to flip opponents but because of how effectively it stopped even the largest players.  Some of the skill in doing the hip check is having "correct" skating posture (low, almost in a seated position), and driving your center of gravity, or hip, just below theirs (roughly the midway point between the knees and hips).  Rugby players could tell you all about the veracity of that approach, though they drive with their shoulder instead.

The emphasis is on taking your strongest balance point against their more-upright posture and either flipping them, knocking them backwards, or stopping them in their tracks.  Sometimes in youth hockey we had a drill where you played tag with your butt, with the intention on working on staying low and pushing through that critical, powerful balance point.

At some step of the way, that approach lost its appeal; it wasn't as flashy as the guys who punched forward, trying to launch with their elbows and shoulders, looking to knock their man out.  And that's what it was, too: we wanted to waste that fucker.  I'll admit, there were times when I hit high, but outside of possibly knocking the guy out it was not particularly effective, often put me out of position, and didn't help when it came to pinning a player along the boards.  When I started to referee hockey games, I'd see the same thing everywhere, with the same high hitting espoused and few players looking to drive through their hip.  Eventually, USA Hockey added a penalty for that kind of hit, a sort of illegal-hands-to-the-face call.

I personally never got a shot at the higher levels of hockey (undersized high school defencemen have to be Bobby Orr to even get a look in the States), but my focus on hitting through my hips made that my primary instinct throughout high school and helped me play bigger than my size.  I wish I could have been big enough to use it at the professional level; it certainly worked for a guy like Rob Blake.  He was great for literally turning his ass into the player, and when he used that lower point of contact he delivered possibly the biggest hits I've ever seen.  Have a look at some of these.  Notice the hits on Jochen Hecht and Martin Straka in particular.

I've had a chance to sort of revive this approach to hitting in roller derby, as it's illegal to hit with your arms and to hit your opponent above the shoulders.  The most effective way to hit in derby is use the same kind of hit as a hip check; if you do it right, you can even incorporate a "lift" into the hit which will completely take the player out of control.

It is too rare to see an NHL player take that kind of approach to hitting.  NHLers have the same habit I was noticing in my teammates, the desire to blast someone through the shoulders and elbows, making the point of contact far removed from the targeted player's balance point.  Whomever their coaches have been, they've not spent enough time addressing the fact that their players are sacrificing a large amount of power and control to do that.  Hell, just show some videos of Keith Ballard's hip checks, and you can see what kind of power a smaller hitter can generate from getting lower and hitting his or her opponent's center of gravity.  Ballard as an example also brings up an important couple points: some contemporary players do keep low in their hits, and a lot of them are defencemen.

Brendan Shanahan said (of Brad Boyes) that the onus is on the player to not hit their opponent in the head.  The onus is also on NHLers, and players at every level, to become better, lower hitters.  By being aware of their target and their approach,  there's no reason players can't reduce the number of head hits in the future.

Comment 25 comments  |  3 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

enforcers willneed raises to cover loss wages

where an enforcer was generally a cheap salary, these guys need to get some more $$$. Look at Travor Gillies last season, he was out 19 games, that is a huge chunk of his salary.

Any task BIG or small, Do it well or not at all

by Rickfansince76 on Sep 28, 2011 10:00 AM EDT reply actions  

If that's the case, they'll probably be phased out

Teams aren’t likely to overpay for a guy like Gillies.

Co-Manager at Arctic Ice Hockey

Want Jets historical stats, Gabe Desjardins metrics, Jets prospect scouting reports, player previews, and old school photos from the WHA days? Get your copy of the First Commemorative Maple Street Press Winnipeg Jets Annual for 2011-12 here.

by Bettman's Nightmare on Sep 28, 2011 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

Gillies

yea…he’s fairly one dimensional that guy

In Canada our balls are bigger

by canadian texan on Sep 29, 2011 12:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

Or maybe we’ll rid the game of enforcers fighting staged battles.

Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.

by Chemmy on Sep 28, 2011 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

Next issue... equipment

Now if they will only address an equally important aspect of hits to the head and that is what they are hitting with. The plastic used in the shoulder pads and elbow pads is pretty close to being like hitting someone with a piece of steel.

This year they are experimenting with softer slbow and shoulder pads being mandatory. History says that someone will have to die or get really seriously disabled for life for the NHL to look at that issue.

by Marvellous on Sep 28, 2011 11:20 AM EDT reply actions  

Agreed

There’s a certain point when the padding went beyond protection and into the realm of inflicting punishment on your opponent. I remember there being a set of Winnwell shoulder pads that could double as football pads.

Co-Manager at Arctic Ice Hockey

Want Jets historical stats, Gabe Desjardins metrics, Jets prospect scouting reports, player previews, and old school photos from the WHA days? Get your copy of the First Commemorative Maple Street Press Winnipeg Jets Annual for 2011-12 here.

by Bettman's Nightmare on Sep 28, 2011 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think you just described pretty much every set of shoulder pads on the market

The only exception I saw when I bought my own shoulder pads a few weeks ago, was the sherwood “vintage” shoulder pads, that looked like the Cooper ones my dad used to wear…and even those had plastic in the shoulders!

by Matt97 on Sep 28, 2011 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

lacrosse

I always found it weird how different lacrosse (box) pads were from hockey pads. As far as what they protect against, lacrosse and hockey should be pretty similar. High-speed rubber ball / puck, checks against the boards, falls on the floor / ice, etc.

Lacrosse pads are a ton less bulky / pointy / weapon-like however. My guess is that in box, you can only really hit with your stick, so there’s no emphasis in making your equipment a facilitator for a more violent check. Hockey equipment clearly doesn’t take that approach – but probably should.

I should caution, it’s been a decade plus since I used lacrosse equipment, so things may have changed, but at least in the 90s that’s the way things were.

by Bourque77 on Sep 28, 2011 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

they are experimenting with softer slbow and shoulder pads being mandatory.
someone will have to die or get really seriously disabled for life for the NHL to look at that issue.

wha?

by meetyourmako on Sep 28, 2011 7:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

In Juniors

Sorry I meant being mandatory in Junior hockey.

by Marvellous on Sep 28, 2011 11:22 AM EDT reply actions  

Great work.

Hell on Ice/In Lou We Trust/Twitter
That's it. I'm sending you to El Paso to live with your real parents.

by Kevin Sellathamby on Sep 28, 2011 12:27 PM EDT reply actions  

Good stuff. Blake was a beauty. I remember going to an Oilers season opener sometime in the late 90s vs. the Kings and watching Blake absolutely crush Andrei Kovalenko with a jarring but clean jolt. I was sitting in the blues and felt winded from that impact. After regaining my breath I confidently said to my wife, “this is Day One but I guarantee you that one will be in the top ten hits of the season”. Just used his big ass, like the Hecht hit. Textbook.

Oilers fan through thick, thin and anorexic. Writer for The Cult of Hockey.

by Bruce McCurdy on Sep 28, 2011 12:47 PM EDT reply actions  

Prediction on suspensions

Shanahan is going to have his hands full in the first half of the season, handing out suspensions left right and centre…and everyone is going to start complaining about the number of suspensions.
…but then, something interesting will happen: the players will learn to hit PROPERLY! And then suspensions will be few and far between (but no less severe).

Remember when the NHL issued more strick ‘obstruction’ penalty rules? The focus for the first few months was on the number of penalties “ruining the flow of the game”, but eventually everyone got the message, and here we are today.

by Matt97 on Sep 28, 2011 12:51 PM EDT reply actions  

Referees use that approach all the time

Calling a game close to the vest in the first period can sometimes make for a clean game.

Co-Manager at Arctic Ice Hockey

Want Jets historical stats, Gabe Desjardins metrics, Jets prospect scouting reports, player previews, and old school photos from the WHA days? Get your copy of the First Commemorative Maple Street Press Winnipeg Jets Annual for 2011-12 here.

by Bettman's Nightmare on Sep 28, 2011 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't buy it

I think refs should call the game by the book, regardless of the score, the infractor, the period, the importance of the game – no matter what.

But they don’t.

by Rob Vollman on Sep 28, 2011 5:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

ain’t nobody in any game of hockey anywhere in north america ever called a game ‘by the book’. seriously, take an afternoon, read the nhl rules cover to cover, and contemplate how many penalties there are and how vaguely they’re defined. for example:

“Charging shall mean the actions of a player who, as a result of distance traveled, shall violently check an opponent in any manner.”

i figure the strictest ref in the game only calls maybe 60% of what, technically, by the book, could be considered penalizable.

additionally though, great article. there’s a cultural problem in hockey where some players learn to hit viciously rather than accurately, and get rewarded for it by coaches who realize there is a certain value to recklessness. these players aren’t malevolent, in that i don’t think they’re deliberately attempting to injure anyone, they’re just profiting from their indifference to injuring people. the attitude is “it’s other players’ responsibility to not be concussed by me”. so i have a heap of respect for shanahan putting the responsibility where it belongs.

by ephie on Sep 28, 2011 8:31 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

100% correct, Ben. I don’t know why more people in the mainstream don’t mention this. They talk about “finishing your check” and look to see if a guy left his feet, but completely ignore the fact you can finish a check low instead of high. It drives me friggin bananas everytime you see a guy do that “punch” or “rip” (“rip” is the term I’ve always used for it, which actually is a term from my high school football days, which says something about it’s place in hockey) through his opponents shoulders/head when he hits him – it’s totally uncalled for.

There is nothing sexier in hockey than a picture perfect hip check. It’s a damn shame that it’s become such a lost art.

http://sacrificethebody.blogspot.com/
Sacrifice the Body - Examining the NHL through statistical analysis, reasoned thought, and blind conjecture.

by IAmJoe on Sep 28, 2011 12:53 PM EDT reply actions  

The biggest problem with hip checks nowadays, is that refs call almost every single one of them a penalty. It doesn’t matter how clean it is, it seems that everything is deemed as “clipping”. It’s especially odd since officials almost never call knee-on-knee collisions.

Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/andrewberkshire

by Andrew Berkshire on Sep 28, 2011 1:31 PM EDT reply actions  

Exhibit A

Was that Ballard hit on Jordin Tootoo. How do you trip a guy on a check when he’s 5’9"?

Co-Manager at Arctic Ice Hockey

Want Jets historical stats, Gabe Desjardins metrics, Jets prospect scouting reports, player previews, and old school photos from the WHA days? Get your copy of the First Commemorative Maple Street Press Winnipeg Jets Annual for 2011-12 here.

by Bettman's Nightmare on Sep 28, 2011 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

haha I saw a “clipping” penalty this last year. I thought they made it up. Seriously never heard of that in hockey before.

by meetyourmako on Sep 28, 2011 7:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ballards checks look dangerous as hell in their own right. I imagine a guy could break his neck.

by samspade on Sep 28, 2011 8:02 PM EDT reply actions  

If you build it, they will come...to realize their errors

Shanahan has to drop the fist now to make players realize when the games really matter that they’re going to sit for a while and thus be detrimental to their team in the playoff hunt…or even playoffs if he decides to stay away from the “1 playoff game equals 2 regular season games” suspensions

At least now the Bruins can finally be suspended too

In Canada our balls are bigger

by canadian texan on Sep 29, 2011 12:39 AM EDT reply actions  

Hip Checks

are gone because the league started giving players tripping and or interference penalties. this new NHL is lame.

http://restorations.bandcamp.com/

by Val_d'Or on Sep 29, 2011 9:32 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

While I agree that it’s unfortunate that hip checks are now pretty much a lost art, I find it very hard to miss the “good old days” (aka clutch-and-grab hockey) of the NHL.

Furthermore, don’t we all now look like barbarians for blaming Lindros and Lindros alone for “keeping his head down” when he got multiple concussions?

by Matt97 on Oct 6, 2011 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Great article

A coaching shift towards teaching clean, low hits is a point that needs to be made again and again.

I especially appreciated the Rob Blake highlight reel. Everyone remembers his PP acumen, but man, that guy could destroy people. Love that hit on Hecht. Is it just me, or does Hecht look like he’s smiling as he’s getting up?

by chris! on Oct 5, 2011 6:36 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The finest Winnipeg Jets analysis on the internets

FanPosts


Managers

Hawerchuk_small Hawerchuk

Gary_bettman_bad_dreams_small Bettman's Nightmare

Grapes_small canadian texan

Howe_small TJCAPS

Editors

Ryan_small SO_RyanP

0_small maplestirup

Jets2_small arby_18