clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

Pilots Logbook 2013-14: Michael Frolik

The Winnipeg Jets 2013-14 season has been laid to rest. This series will take an in-depth look how the team and its players have performed, and some decisions that could push the Jets forward in the future.

Bruce Fedyck-USA TODAY Sports

When Kevin Cheveldayoff traded for Michael Frolik, Arctic Ice Hockey got pretty excited. The underlying numbers indicated that Frolik was a player that tilted the ice in his team favour, improved his linemates, and struggled scoring due to low on-ice shooting percentages and lower quality of linemates... AKA, another Alexander Burmistrov.

The Basics

GP G A P TOI/GP S/60 Sh% PenD
81 15 27 42 16.4 8.4 7.9% +6

Numbers are for all minutes.

Frolik was just one point shy of his second highest NHL season best, although the 2013-14 season was best for even strength points (both totals and per minute). Frolik has always been a large shot volume player; however, this season Frolik posted more normalized shooting percentages after struggling at 3.6% in Chicago.



Player usage chart from

EV Percentage of Team's Available TOI 5 on 5
51.5% +0.4% 28.6 18.9% 22.8% 29.0% 30.6%
9th 9th 7th 8th 6th 5th 4th

Rankings are given for team out of 15 forwards to play 20 or more games.

Frolik's zone deployment was average for the team. He received a boost in even strength and power play time at the cost of reducing his penalty kill time from years prior. The only real critique one could have on Frolik is that he did not produce well on the power play, despite the additional TOI. If Paul Maurice keeps Frolik with Andrew Ladd and Bryan Little, we will likely see a rise in Frolik's QoC next season.

Underlying Numbers


The y-axis is given to show the typical 40-60 sustainable spread seen for NHL calibre players. Players are compared to particular line/pair depending on 5v5 TOI per game. Population mean (average), median (50th percentile), and other percentiles are relative to player performance between 2007-12.

5v5 TOI Corsi% relCorsi% dCF/20 dCA/20 dCorsi%
14.09 53.0% +4.3% 2.695 -0.109 +3.565%

RelCorsi is team team's percentage of shot attempts with player on ice minus shot attempts with player off ice. Delta Corsi values are team's shot attempt rates with player on ice, but relative to league norm given similar usage (quality of teammates, quality opponents, zone starts, and TOI). dCF/20 is shot attempts for -where a positive number is above average-, dCA/20 is shot attempts against -where a negative number is above average-, and dCorsi% is percentage of shot attempts.

Taters pushed the play well despite a lack of cushy minutes and rotation of roles and linemates. In fact, his underlying metrics were above average for a first line forward, which is what he was deployed as by season's end. The Jets were a bit weird with their TOI allocation, with 7 forwards being given first line minutes, and everyone else experienced almost none.


2013-14 was a personal best for Frolik in scoring and advance metrics. We may see some reduced scoring next season, although extra power play time may counteract any regression. What really matters was Frolik was able to improve the Jets shot metrics, making up for the loss of Burmistrov, although was able to earn the trust of his coach so his positive on-ice results were magnified, unlike Burmistrov.

Keep or lose?

Frolik is a restricted free agent this summer and the Jets better keep him. The biggest problem outside of starting goaltender is a lack of players who improve possession. The extra added ability to finish is nice, although not aa pressing of need. Of the Jets 15 skaters to play 25% or more of the season, only six were above 50% for Corsi, and two of them were under severe sheltered minutes. Stanley Cup finalists New York Rangers only had all but 4 and those were under tough zone starts. The other finalists, Los Angeles Kings, had an entire team above 50%.

Bonus: Frolik's ability to push the play

While Frolik's counting statistics suffered from usage in Chicago, underlying statistics always showed Frolik to be a plus player. We can see Frolik's affect on the team by comparing his seasonal numbers relative to his team's without him on the ice.


Even when he was on Stanley Cup calibre teams, Frolik was pushing the play well.

All numbers are from Extra Skater, Behind the Net and Hockey Analysis