clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

Pilot's Logbook 2011-12: Alexander Burmistrov

Ooo, they're finally letting him play with the puck!
Ooo, they're finally letting him play with the puck!

The Pilot's Logbook looks at the performances of regular Jets players over the course of 2011-12, primarily through time on-ice and Gabe's player performance charts.

Where Tim Stapleton was the lightning rod for debate this year, pretty much all of us agreed on Alexander Burmistrov: the kid is talented. Whether it was using his speed to make some pretty awesome backchecks, or plucking the puck off players' sticks on the kill, or dangling with the puck on a string, we could all see the potential radiating off the former 1st rounder. Unfortunately, it seemed like all the verve we had for him early in the year faded with the boxcars later in the season, and since the more sensational Jets writers (not at AIH) suggested he might need AHL seasoning to right the ship, we ought to take a closer look. Y'know, before we throw the baby out with the bathwater. And he does look like a baby.

GP G A P +/- PIM PPP SHP SOG 5v5 TOI/60 (Fwd Rk) 5v4 TOI 4v5 TOI
2011 - Alexander Burmistrov 76 13 15 28 4 42 3 1 123 13.20 (5th) 1.22 (8th) 1.77 (3rd)

Let's think about this practically: it is very rare for a coach to trust a player this young with so many 4v5 minutes. And it's especially rare for a guy with such an obvious talent for offence to get so many 4v5 minutes and so few 5v4 minutes. But here we are.




Such a weird set of charts, as we see both his 5v5 and 5v4 minutes decrease as the year went on, yet his 4v5 minutes stay roughly the same. There are definitely opportunities lost here, in particular opportunities for Burmistrov to display his offensive talents. The primary opportunity gained was one to engage a narrative about another enigmatic Russian who needed to be sent down, when the real enigma was Claude Noel.



This certainly has the looks of a plus player who could take advantage of a nice assignment, not a guy who needs to be sent down. Granted, the difference between good and mediocre players on this latter chart seem like thin pie slices, but surely you can see that we should be talking about other players on the roster first if the conversation turns to demotion.

Performance/Usage Grade: B-

The guy's possibly our best penalty killing forward, he's good at drawing penalties, and he plays a sound evens game (albeit a cushy assignment). Noel did some damage in Burmi's usage and didn't allow him to snap his slumps...I give Noel a pass because he's new to the roster and needs to figure out his players, but I don't give a pass to anybody engaging the narrative that Burmi doesn't belong in the NHL.

Performance/Contract Grade: B-

Burmi's $1.5 million cap hit, and another year off his ELC, were poorly put to use. You can blame Atlanta management who threw him into the fire too early for the fact that next year is his last entry-level year. I'll hold Burmistrov to the fact that he only managed 28 points, but for an adept penalty killer who played a good evens game I otherwise believe this was a pretty good cap hit for the return. Let's hope we don't do anything stupid going into next year - give the 20-year old a chance. And preferably at wing, please.