Comments / New

Penalty Killers who Take Penalties

The Falconer posed an interesting question last week: “[what is the] effect of a PK going to the box? I did a post on “costly penalties” a couple of years ago. J.P. read my post and noted that it seemed like whenever a member of the Thrashers PK unit took a penalty the opposition was more likely to score. Sure enough that is the case, the opposition PK% rose to something like 25% when an Atlanta PKer went to the box. I’d love to see a breakdown of this for the entire NHL…”

I'm going to approach this from a slightly different perspective – if a regular penalty-killer goes to the box, how does that change the rate of shots allowed by the penalty-killing team?  Because there are so many more shots than goals, shot rate gives you a better sense of the opponent's offense.

So far, I ran this analysis for 2008-09 – I picked out every forward who played more than two minutes at 4-on-5 per game, played more than 70 games, and didn't change teams.  I then looked at the following quantities:

1) Shot rate against at 4-on-5 when this group of players was in on the ice.

2) Shot rate against at 4-on-5 when this group of players was not on the ice – but not while they were in the box and only in games that they actually played in.

3) Shot rate against at 4-on-5 when this group of players was not on the ice – but only in the 120 seconds following one of these players taking a penalty.

And the results:

On-Ice ShA/60 Off-Ice ShA/60 TOI On/G TOI Off/G
In Box 78.7 0:18
Not In Box 72.5 70.8 2:37 3:46

 

We see several effects here – the first is that the opponent's shot rate is substantially higher when one of these penalty-killing forwards is in the box.  So The Falconer's insight is correct – when a first line PP unit goes up against a PK unit that's missing one of its top players, we should expect more shots on goal.

The second might be surprising: the shot rate against the our top penalty-killers is worse than against their lesser teammates.  But this is a reflection of the drop-off in talent on the opponent's 2nd-line PP relative to the 1st line, as opposed to the PK unit's performance.

***Update***

I mentioned below in the comments that PK save percentage is mostly luck.  To elaborate on that – if you take the individual team save percentages at 5v4 over the last two seasons (just G and SOG, but excluding missed shots), the average shooting percentage is 12.67%, with a team standard deviation of 0.01892.  If I run a simulation of random shooting over 10000 seasons – where I assume every shot has a 12.67% chance of going in – the standard deviation of shooting percentage is 0.01603.  So 72% of the variance of shooting percentage is due to luck, and 28% to other factors. 

You can read much, much more about this at Objective NHL.

Looking for an easy way to support Arctic Ice Hockey?
Use our Affiliate Link when shopping hockey merch this holiday season!

Talking Points