Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Will Rhymes 'Fine' After Being Hit By Pitch And Fainting

Impact of Winning an Offensive Zone Faceoff, Even-Strength vs Power-Play

I got a number of questions about the impact of winning and losing offensive zone faceoffs. The way to think about this is to look at the shot rates in the time following a faceoff:

Star-divide

Shot_rates_post_faceoff_medium

In the long-run, shot rates ultimately converge regardless of whether the faceoff is won or lost. Obviously even-strength shot rate differential converges to zero, while on the PP it is strongly positive for the team with the man-advantage.

It's interesting to see that the peak shot rate is higher at even-strength than on the PP. Just a guess, but a PP faceoff win allows a team to set up in the offensive zone and work the puck around for a better shot. At even-strength, teams are much more likely to win the draw back to the point and blast the puck at the net, hoping for a screen or a deflection.

Here's the shot differential for faceoff wins vs losses at even-strength and on the power-play:

Shot_rates_post_faceoff_delta_medium

For even-strength faceoffs, all we need to go is integrate the area under the blue curve and multiply by EV shooting percentage, which is 5.97%. This gives us a goal differential of +2.45 goals per 100 extra faceoff wins, or 245 faceoffs per two points in the standings. (Incidentally, a neutral zone faceoff is worth +0.9 goals per 100 extra faceoff wins, or two points in the standings per 657 extra faceoff wins.)

On the PP, the story is slightly different due to the asymmetry of shooting percentages:

Win: shots for = 1.332; shots against = 0.200

Loss: shots for = 0.938; shots against = 0.216

On the PP, the shooting percentage for shots for is 8.98%, while it's 7.21% for shots against. That gives us +3.66 goals per 100 faceoff extra wins.

This tells us that a team needs to win 164 additional power-play or penalty-kill faceoffs to get one additional win. But a team typically only takes 790 such faceoffs per season, so it would be virtually impossible to win 164 more faceoffs. On the other hand, teams typically take 2200 even-strength faceoffs in the offensive or defensive zone per game year (remember that the offensive zone result is symmetric in the defensive zone) so it is much more likely that a team could win 245 additional faceoffs.

Comment 5 comments  |  3 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

teams typically take 2200 even-strength faceoffs in the offensive or defensive zone per game

I’m surprised they have any time left to fit in the rest of the action!

Managing Editor of On the Forecheck, SB Nation's blog covering the Nashville Predators, and founder of Hockey Gear HQ, a site devoted to hockey equipment and accessories.

by Dirk Hoag on Oct 18, 2011 10:24 AM EDT reply actions  

“The game” = the whole season

by Hawerchuk on Oct 18, 2011 11:30 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Gabe, how hard would it be to get an adjusted faceoff . You always wonder which center’s face the better faceoff men over the course of a season. If may change some players from 49.5 to 52% or vice versa.

by MacIsaacFC on Oct 19, 2011 3:14 PM EDT reply actions  

Doesn’t really impact things. Bigger issue is an imbalance of PP/PK or O/D zone faceoffs

by Hawerchuk on Oct 19, 2011 11:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The finest Winnipeg Jets analysis on the internets

FanPosts


Managers

Hawerchuk_small Hawerchuk

Gary_bettman_bad_dreams_small Bettman's Nightmare

Grapes_small canadian texan

Howe_small TJCAPS

Editors

Ryan_small SO_RyanP

0_small maplestirup

Jets2_small arby_18