The 1992-93 Season: A Last Hurrah for 1980s Hockey
Whether it's a show on VH1 or a casual conversation with friends, we have a tendency to identify cultural and social shifts by decades, with each having unique characteristics. This can sometimes be the case in terms of hockey playing styles, with the 1980s in particular being renowned for a period of big offensive numbers and flippin' sweet (or flippin' ugly) jerseys.
But decades aren't always the best markers of profound socio-cultural change: Guns N Roses took "hair bands" beyond the 80s, the "trilogy" format in movies began in the late 60s but carried on long afterward, and the "hippie"/activist movements were as much a part of the early 70s as they were the mid- to late 60s. In the same way, the kind of hockey we were used to in the 80s wasn't isolated to it; the numbers suggest they carried on into the 90s, and had a distinct departure after the 1992-93 season.
You know what (puts on Hypercolor shirt, L.A. Gear shoes, and does this), let me set the mood...
Ah, the early 90s. Meat Loaf was telling me he'd do anything for love (except "that"), while Bryan Adams was taking a much easier route by saying that everything he does, he does it for me. Gabe was angrily sending back his Milli Vanilli tape for a refund, while I was getting a lot of mileage out of neon sweatshirts and those big sunglasses (you could get a pair like those for "free" by sending in UPC labels from Malt-O-Meal). I had Lisa Turtle on my mind (sorry Kelly Kapowski; turns out Screech had good taste), and Loaded Weapon 1 in the VCR.
In the NHL, the early 90s were still holding on to that 80s flavor. But then it did a curious thing. All of a sudden, the league added a warm-weather team in San Jose, only to follow that in 1992-93 by adding another warm-weather team in Tampa Bay and bringing back an old franchise in Ottawa. It was the first expansion in over a decade, and though minor in size it was the beginning of an entirely new direction for league performance.
You see, the league did another funny thing in addition to increasing the size of the league (with two more teams to come in Florida and Anaheim the following year): they expanded the season to 84 games (it had been at 80 games previously). Add that to the fact that these new teams were utterly, historically horrible, and you had a distinct offensive uptick in the waning days of goal-drunk hockey. In 1992-93, even-strength goals per game (2.44) were the highest they'd been since the 1989-90 season, power-play (1.03) and short-handed goals per game (0.15) the highest since 1987-88. Shots per game (30.98) were actually the highest since 1985-86. The total goals scored league-wide jumped by 1,200 goals (to 7,311), setting a record that wouldn't be topped until over ten years had passed and the league had added six more teams. We saw career years out of everyone and their respective mothers: Doug Gilmour put up 127 points (22 more than his previous high; he wouldn't top 111 after that), Adam Oates had 142 (27 above his previous best), Pierre Turgeon had 132 (previous best 105), and, not to be outdone, was Mario Lemieux's 69 goals and 160 points in 60 games. Phil Housley nearly had 100 points, and Rick Tocchet almost reached the exclusive 50+ goals, 100+ points, and 200+ PIM club (only members: Brendan Shanahan and Kevin Stevens) by scoring 48 and 109, and racking up 252 minutes. Brian Bradley somehow put up 40+ goals and 86 points for a 23-54-7 team whose second-leading scorer had 56 points. Eric Lindros lived up to expectations by blasting 41 goals in his rookie season and then out-hugeifying people (yeah, there are a lot of headshots in that video). Hell, even Stumpy put up 87 points!
Just as importantly, European-born, European-trained players were also setting career highs and opening eyes everywhere. My greatest memories of that season weren't of Patrick Roy and the Canadiens defeating that 30-year-old-plus former-Oiler laser show in Los Angeles, but of the goal-scoring battle between Alexander Mogilny and Teemu Selanne. Both were incredible that year; Mogilny the talented Russian forward who just hadn't put together a full season to that point, Selanne a former 1st-rounder that had set every Finnish league on fire before laying nearly all the rookie scoring records to waste. Pavel Bure was similarly wreaking havoc, posting his first of two back-to-back 60-goal seasons in Vancouver, while young phenoms Sergei Fedorov, Jaromir Jagr, and Mats Sundin (who eclipsed 100 points for his first and only time) scored the best points-per-game of their careers to that point. As if to announce their presence, dynamic young Unified and Swedish teams would capture Olympics gold in 1992 and 1994. Game after game, they kept scoring, and with every goal they caused more and more NHL scouts to hop red-eyes across the pond.
In the same way that 1992-93 was about excess, it was also about decline. The Edmonton Oilers, only two years removed from a Stanley Cup, now had one of the worst offenses in the NHL. Their leading scorer, Petr Klima, had 48 points. Penalty minutes, which had been incredibly high in the mid- to late 1980s (~24 PIM/G) was beginning a slow decline back to the sub-20s, never (to this point) to return. It would be the last year before defensive systems began to take hold; shooting percentage dropped an entire point from 1992-93 to 1993-94 (from 11.8 to 10.8) to its lowest level in 20 years. Shooting percentage never recovered either, as it has held in the upper 9s to lower 10s ever since. Shots-for per game also never recovered; after lulling below 30.5 for a couple of years, it dropped below 30 and stayed there until 2008-09.
The fantastic results of the 1992-93 season stood on the edge of profound change in the league, to a new NHL mired in Dead Puck but also excitingly new in its infusion of foreign-trained players. If you are going to talk about eras and beginnings and ends, the 1992-93 season certainly should merit strong consideration as the "end of 1980s hockey."
On a personal note, the first substantial number of hockey cards I ever bought were Topps Premier of the 1992-93 season. I read through them all, and sorted them and memorized everything on the back, sparking my interest in numbers in hockey.
P.S. I lifted a ton of player links from hockeydb.com, so thanks for that. Also, most of the league data is taken from Gabe's page at behindthenet.ca, found here.
30 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I read this entire post with the theme from NHLPA ’93 running through my head.
That’s a good thing.
Down Goes Brown - Unapologetically nostalgic for the past. Brutally realistic about the present. Grudgingly optimistic about the future.
by Down Goes Brown on Jan 21, 2011 10:21 AM EST reply actions
Is is reason’s like this that synthesizers will never die.
Does he call it Luongo underwear?
Co-Manager at Behind the Net
by Bettman's Nightmare on Jan 21, 2011 10:56 AM EST up reply actions
Grammar will, though.
Does he call it Luongo underwear?
Co-Manager at Behind the Net
by Bettman's Nightmare on Jan 21, 2011 10:56 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
The 92-93 NHL season, like the 1987 baseball season, has always fascinated me as a sports nerd. Some favorite stat lines from this season:
Vladimir Rucizka: 39 G 36 A (he scored 24 more NHL goals)
Alex Semak: 37 G 42 A (he scored 41 more NHL goals)
Evgeny Davydov: 28 G 21 A (he scored 8 more NHL goals – he was awesome in NHL94 too)
Dmitri Kvartalnov: 30 G 42 A (he played 30 more NHL games)
I was 10 when this season happened, and I wasn’t a hockey fan at all – I would’ve been real curious to know what made these guys so good during this season only to wash out so quickly. Adjusting defenses? Better goalies? Western capitalist pigdog luxuries?
Ruzicka’s was in 91-92, but it’s a good point. Honestly, I think the NHL teams got more and more scouts on the ground and realized that the younger talent would make for a better investment than the players who had probably already peaked.
Does he call it Luongo underwear?
Co-Manager at Behind the Net
by Bettman's Nightmare on Jan 21, 2011 11:04 AM EST up reply actions
“On the ground” meaning in Europe.
Does he call it Luongo underwear?
Co-Manager at Behind the Net
by Bettman's Nightmare on Jan 21, 2011 11:07 AM EST up reply actions
Oops, good catch on Rucizka.
I don’t think that fully explains what happened, and how many great European players did we see come into the league after 92-93 as opposed to before? Bure, Mogilny, Fedorov, Jagr, etc. were all already in the league. A cursory search shows Renberg, Naslund, and Yashin had their rookie seasons in 94. I guess it’s more likely that their successes were S% and soft-ice-time related and that a minor drop in performance would get them removed from cushy slots, but still, it was an odd time for hockey.
I guess I should note that a similar thing happened in 2005-06, where Petr Prucha, Jonathan Cheechoo, and Marek Svatos all had 30+ goals, and all were fringe players or out of the league at the beginning of this year.
Ruzicka never got along with Boston coaches but couldn’t leave them. They thought he never gave a damn and hated his effort.
If you look at it, his 92-93 wasn’t too different than his 91-92. He missed some games, but given his shots / game, if he had the same shooting percentage as 91-92, he would have potted 30+ goals.
But he and Sutter got along terribly. He left Boston as a free agent after Sutter’s first year and went to Ottawa and was re-united with Bowness (why, I have no idea, Bowness never liked up). He and Bowness had a huge blow up in a practice and Ruzicka quit to go back to Europe.
And while we’re speaking of Saved by the Bell … Kelly’s still my favorite
I seem to remember reading somewhere, way back, that the 1st half of the 92-93 season was the (very) first attempt to crack down on obstruction, that refs were told to call anything that was interference. The story went that as long as the league stuck to its guns, Bure & co were able to run rampant but that GMs tired of the eternal revolving door at the penalty box and pressured the higher ups to ease off and by the end of the season (and certainly 93-94) obstruction was back to stay.
I can’t remember if I read this in the context of 05-06 or whether it was, as I suspect, much much earlier.
Is there any way to have look at scoring trends during 92-93?
There’s a simpler explanation. My mother picked them in her hockey pool.
http://vollman.blogspot.com/2007/04/nhl-players-my-mom-has-picked.html
That would doom any player.
by Rob Vollman on Jan 21, 2011 11:29 AM EST up reply actions
So that’s what happened to Mike Green!
Does he call it Luongo underwear?
Co-Manager at Behind the Net
by Bettman's Nightmare on Jan 21, 2011 11:44 AM EST up reply actions
My memory on Kvartalnov isn’t too good (shaming myself on this one), so I had to look it up.
First, I didn’t realize he set a record for consecutive games with a point to start your NHL career – only broken by Malkin.
Second, the link seems to cover his career and makes some sense. Kvartalnov in his rookie year was on a line with Juneau and Oates. Pretty good spot to pick up some points. 93-94 he was replaced on the wing by a guy having what I found to be one of the most exciting seasons to follow. Somehow, he got bumped from first line to fourth line as a result of that. He didn’t last half a season and left to go back to Europe.
Since all four guys you named are Russian, and given the little history I can remember and dug up on the two Bruins, I think xenophobia was probably involved in their lack of future careers. That’s at least part of the reason for Kvartalnov and Ruzicka. Today, I’d imagine they’d be given another chance / want another chance, but when Russians first started coming over, there was a lot of talk about not being able to win with Russians – dealing with whatever ism you wanna call that and not having any Russian teammates probably made the trip back overseas pretty inviting.
That was an awesome year for Neely; I’m glad he got into the HOF, because that guy lost at least another couple of 50-goal seasons to injury, if not more.
Does he call it Luongo underwear?
Co-Manager at Behind the Net
by Bettman's Nightmare on Jan 22, 2011 1:40 AM EST up reply actions
Bittersweet memories for sure. I, of course, remember the Cup run with fond memories. But I also remember the context: my best friends at the time were Penguins fans, so I got to rub it in their faces. That was awesome.
It was also the year I last played minor hockey. I hit a growth spurt, my parent’s really couldn’t afford new equipment (particularly goalie gear), and the family moved to a new town.
Puck Worlds: Chasing Pucks from here to Turku.
For Twitter Updates on Puck Worlds, follow @puckworlds. For updates plus additional witty banter from yours truly, follow @saskhab.
Yeah, I think the American lens takes away the greatness of a Canadian team winning the Cup (in the Forum, no less) against an LA team that basically bankrolled its talent.
Does he call it Luongo underwear?
Co-Manager at Behind the Net
by Bettman's Nightmare on Jan 21, 2011 11:09 AM EST up reply actions
This is going to make you guys feel really old, but I was 2 at the conclusion of the 92-93 season. I like reading stuff like this because it allows me to keep today’s game in perspective.
The 4th Line Blog
Go Flames Go
by Justin Azevedo on Jan 21, 2011 10:03 PM EST up reply actions
No sweat; I stopped feeling old when I learned Macaulay Culkin is older than me and was dating Mila Kunis. I figured I’m always going to be younger than that guy, and now that Mila Kunis is available I have a chance (although Sean Leahy told me he made her a killer diorama, so it appears I have some ground to make up.)
Does he call it Luongo underwear?
Co-Manager at Behind the Net
by Bettman's Nightmare on Jan 22, 2011 1:37 AM EST up reply actions
2 things that stand out from the 1992-1993 season:
(1) Good: Alex Kovalev makes his debut. I’ve been a hockey fan since the late 70s, and no one had more innate talent with a puck then him. Unfortunately, he was not gifted with anything near superstar level of “hockey sense”.
(2) Bad:
Gary Bruce Bettman (born June 2, 1952) is the commissioner of the National Hockey League (NHL), a post he has held since February 1, 1993.
Glen Sather is a Hockey Genius.
http://twitter.com/ThGeneralissimo
http://twitter.com/poplosertwit
1. Man did he look stellar out on the ice at times. I remember thinking to myself, “This guy’s 19 years old, and he’s going to have a helluva career.” Haha.
2. I thought about including Bettman, but why ruin it. I also wanted to make sure there weren’t any undue connections between those early 90s warm-weather teams and Bettman; he saved his “genius” in that regard for later years.
Does he call it Luongo underwear?
Co-Manager at Behind the Net
by Bettman's Nightmare on Jan 21, 2011 12:03 PM EST up reply actions
Well, Sylvain was always much, much better…
Does he call it Luongo underwear?
Co-Manager at Behind the Net
by Bettman's Nightmare on Jan 22, 2011 2:12 AM EST up reply actions
FWIW
I’ve always thought that Turgeon getting wiped out did his careers no favors. Not that a separated shoulder is necessarily the same as wrecking a knee, but shoulders rarely heal quite the same afterward. Also, Dale Hunter is a $%&&^*(!. That is all.
making you Google since 2004
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
Fall of the Berlin Wall/Iron Curtain
It was amazing for hockey. A whole GENERATION of players, not just one or two draft classes, came over during and after the Olympics. I think a key point is that these weren’t just prospects, although guys like Jagr and Holik were. There were career pros ranging from Yuri Khmylev to Makarov coming over ready to play a variety of roles. Of course, this was a one time event and many of the players had a hard time adjusting as they came from a regimented background to pro life in the NHL (unlike today’s players who have the cultural differences, but not the total isolation from the Western world that guys like Mogilny and Federov knew before their defections).
Indeed, a very, very interesting time.
TV timeouts
The league also changed their TV timeout rules before the 92/93 season. Scotty Bowman used that change to get Mario Lemieux more ice time.
This notes column by Ron Maclean mentions the change (near the bottom). At the time, Scotty Bowman was pretty open about the fact that he was taking advantage of the change to get Mario on the ice more.
If other coaches did the same with their star players, this would have contributed to the large number of career years by top scorers in 1992-93.
Interesting point to make. I hadn’t heard of that.
Does he call it Luongo underwear?
Co-Manager at Behind the Net
by Bettman's Nightmare on Jan 25, 2011 12:12 PM EST up reply actions

by 

















