Icing Leaders, For and Against
It's a funny thing - icing, which we normally associate with a weak defensive team desperately trying to clear the puck - does not seem to correlate very well with that image. The table below shows the percentage of icings that were committed by a given team. Edmonton has the best record - just 41.7% of icings in its games were by the Oilers - while New Jersey and Nashville find themselves at the other end of the spectrum.
| Team | IceA | IceF | Pct |
| edm | 239 | 171 | 41.7 |
| pit | 237 | 170 | 41.8 |
| buf | 235 | 176 | 42.8 |
| ott | 250 | 199 | 44.3 |
| tor | 261 | 211 | 44.7 |
| bos | 253 | 219 | 46.4 |
| ana | 209 | 183 | 46.7 |
| cgy | 269 | 240 | 47.2 |
| det | 209 | 187 | 47.2 |
| mon | 222 | 200 | 47.4 |
| col | 212 | 195 | 47.9 |
| la | 198 | 190 | 49.0 |
| car | 230 | 222 | 49.1 |
| chi | 220 | 213 | 49.2 |
| dal | 191 | 186 | 49.3 |
| cls | 227 | 226 | 49.9 |
| van | 215 | 216 | 50.1 |
| nyr | 244 | 246 | 50.2 |
| pho | 218 | 220 | 50.2 |
| was | 218 | 224 | 50.7 |
| tb | 211 | 232 | 52.4 |
| phi | 210 | 236 | 52.9 |
| stl | 224 | 255 | 53.2 |
| sj | 199 | 227 | 53.3 |
| min | 220 | 262 | 54.4 |
| nj | 198 | 236 | 54.4 |
| nyi | 213 | 261 | 55.1 |
| nsh | 206 | 261 | 55.9 |
| atl | 200 | 260 | 56.5 |
| fla | 166 | 280 | 62.8 |
Here are the players who've taken the most faceoffs following an icing call - "Def" means defensive zone draw; in other words, Stephen Weiss led the league in taking draws following his own team icing the puck:
| Player | Off | Player | Def |
| Sidney Crosby | 100 | Stephen Weiss | 75 |
| Mikko Koivu | 87 | Tomas Plekanec | 74 |
| Antoine Vermette | 87 | Daymond Langkow | 70 |
| Jonathan Toews | 87 | Steven Reinprecht | 70 |
| Henrik Sedin | 83 | Nik Antropov | 68 |
| John Tavares | 81 | Paul Stastny | 67 |
| Paul Stastny | 77 | Kyle Brodziak | 67 |
| David Krejci | 77 | John Madden | 67 |
| Vincent Lecavalier | 73 | David Backes | 66 |
| Scott Gomez | 72 | Jay McClement | 66 |
| Stephen Weiss | 71 | Mike Richards | 65 |
| Jason Arnott | 71 | Martin Hanzal | 65 |
| Joe Thornton | 71 | Samuel Pahlsson | 65 |
| Travis Zajac | 70 | Henrik Sedin | 63 |
| Nik Antropov | 69 | Mikko Koivu | 62 |
| Matt Stajan | 68 | Jason Arnott | 61 |
| Jeff Carter | 68 | Ryan Kesler | 61 |
| Matt Duchene | 65 | Rich Peverley | 61 |
| Ryan Kesler | 64 | Marcel Goc | 61 |
| Olli Jokinen | 64 | Matt Stajan | 60 |
| Derek Roy | 64 | Jeff Carter | 60 |
| Jason Spezza | 64 | Chris Drury | 60 |
| Niklas Backstrom | 63 | John Tavares | 59 |
| Patrice Bergeron | 63 | Travis Zajac | 59 |
| Shawn Horcoff | 63 | Niklas Backstrom | 59 |
The makeup of the two lists isn't very surprising. The guys who go on after a change are offensive forwards; the guys who are stuck taking the draw after their own team ices the puck are defensive centermen.
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
defensive draws
Hey Gabe,
Great work. The list of centres taking defensive zone draws is extremely telling because that means it was their line that was on the ice for the actual icing. So you can see which forward lines were more prone to icings. So I guess it makes sense that they are defensive centres because they were probably being pinned in their own end by the other team’s top line, but it’s still a revealing look at which lines are being pinned.
I’ve often said it would be great if the league tracked icings by individual players, but barring that, this is a great alternative.
Arpon
Actually, an interesting data subset would be the percentage of those icing faceoffs that were following a defensive zone faceoff. In other words, is Plekanec pinned in the defensive zone trough icings because he can’t swim upstream or because he keeps getting thrown out there for defensive zone faceoffs by Martin?
But that may be insignificant; the Qualcomp correlation Derek alludes to may be a more fruitful avenue.
Qualcomp
Gabe,
To my eye, it looks like a strong correlation between the centres taking the defensive zone draws and qualcomp.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
Would not have picked the Oilers to be leading this list. Is this just an effect of the Oilers always trailing in the game, is the leading team more likely to ice the puck? On the other hand, Florida being at the bottom of the list makes a lot of sense to me. Even a good team like NJ being near the bottom makes sense because they trap a lot rather than forecheck, and you’re not likely to ice the puck against a trap.
Would not have picked the Oilers to be leading this list. Is this just an effect of the Oilers always trailing in the game,
Tough to ice the puck if you never have it.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
by Derek Zona on Apr 2, 2010 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Just a FYI- feel free to delete this
About half the players come up as red hotlinks and about half as black static text.
In the left column John Tavares comes up as John Tavares " align=“left” height="17">John Tavares Same with Matt Duchene
I get this in both Opera and Firefox
by DoctorMyBrainHurts on Apr 2, 2010 10:39 AM EDT reply actions
What about Defenseman?
Can you produce which defensemen were on the ice for the icings (faceoff after an icing). Last season, it seemed to me that Exelby was constantly dumping the puck down and taking the icing. Could be more of a defenseman stat than a forward stat.
All things Thrashers + stats: www.birdwatchersanonymous.com
Can’t the players on the ice be found with a time stamp in the play by play files? No one can change on an icing, so it would be a matter of merging the icing time stamps with who was on the ice for ensuing faceoff. Probably requires too much work.
All things Thrashers + stats: www.birdwatchersanonymous.com
Backstrom or Backstrom?
I think you mean Nicklas Backstrom in those faceoff lists, not Niklas Backstrom – goalies don’t take too many faceoffs.

by 














