Call Off the Ove-geddon: The Washington Capitals and Ovechkin Usage
Note: FYI, I typed this up Sunday afternoon, so my numbers are a little out of date.
There's been at least a few people wondering what's up with Alex Ovechkin these days, and it's a question worth asking as he's only recently shrugged off a 9-game goal-scoring drought. It hasn't helped him that the Larry Bird to his Magic Johnson, Sidney Crosby, has been picking up goals like they were the last Cabbage Patch dolls in London.
Ovechkin's shot totals are down (a decline that actually started last year), and more importantly his shooting percentage sits at about 3 to 4 percent lower than his career shooting, which is a bit greater decline than normal. Maybe reasons to panic, but when looking at the data on Zone Starts and Quality of Competition/Quality of Teammates, there are plenty of reasons to think Ovechkin's just had an odd start to the year.
Before I go further, if you aren't familiar with Zone Starts or QoC/QoT, take a look at Gabe's explanations: Zone Start / Quality of Competition / Quality of Teammates. These are a handful of ways that you can kind of "weigh" your thinking of player performances.
Let me lay out the last four years among Capitals forwards that have played 40 (20+ in 2010-11) or more games:
Note: This last is as of 27 games into the season.
As you can see, Ovechkin has gradually been given more starts in his own zone (in fact, up to the first 23 games, Ovechkin was actually tied with Chimera for second-to-the-bottom in O-Zone Start %) though, interestingly, facing some of the lowest-rated competition on the team. Perhaps Boudreau was trying to match him with weak opponents, and as a result he put him in for more defensive zone faceoffs, or perhaps Semin's shifts have preceded Ovechkin's quite a bit this year (when they aren't together) and thus have put him in his own zone. It's fair to say that all of Ovechkin's typical linemates (Semin, Backstrom, Knuble) aren't looking so hot with those O-Zone differentials, so that can't help.
An easy answer to the drop in O-Zone starts is that he's getting a more defensive role, but the QoC contradicts that. I do think that the previous year (2009-10) he was given some increased defensive responsibility, but it would be reasonable to expect him to get back around to 54-56% as this year moves along. At no point in this time was he given much shorthanded TOI, but that's as much a testament to the abilities of Chimera, Steckel, and the deliberate attempt to give Ovechkin a rest, as it is a judgment of his defensive capabilities.
In general, I just wanted to calm anybody who thinks Ovechkin is having an "off-year", as his odd usage so far has been as much to blame. Since the last couple of weeks or so, his O-Zone Start % has been slowly rising up, so I wouldn't be surprised to see him get back to his usual self within the month.
Or as Conan says, "Be cool, my babies."
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Also, I don’t think his PDO is north of 105% anymore… :( He’s been playing better of late. I hope it continues.
My blog and Twitter, featuring coverage of the most unpredictable team in the NHL and where we defend Mike Green, Alex Ovechkin, and Alexander Semin until the bitter end. That is to say, when someone tries to call BS on the Corsi numbers.
If you don't know how to use Timeonice, read this.
"Numbers don't lie, they just don't agree with you"--George E. Ays
I don’t think his zone start difference really explains anything. By your own admission, his zone start will “climb back up to between 54 and 56%.” Since Ovechkin has already had about 400 zone starts, a change in the change that you’re expecting to between 54 and 56% would be a difference of 2-12 zone starts right now. I would doubt that would make much of a difference, so even if OV is still getting his usual 56% zone starts, his numbers are just as low.
It’s also odd he’s struggling considering he’s skating against the weakest competition of the last four years and, as usual, with baller teammates. And his PDO is 102.4!!
I don’t have a good answer, but I don’t think his decrease in production has anything to do with a change in usage. It’s really minor.
Hockey Blogger at Pensburgh.com
Really, you’d be looking at the increase over the remaining zone starts for the year, not by how many he’s already had. But it’s not just the percentage itself; I’m arguing in terms of relativity to his teammates as well. To have the same O-Zone Start percentage as Chimera a week-and-a-half ago (at 52.4%)? I expect he’ll sit about the same as he did last year (55.6) eventually, but I put the spread out there because it’s hard to say whether Boudreau will keep up with this. That being said, 3 percent is a pretty big difference when the spread is 10% across the forwards.
What really caught my eye was that he’s never had a O-Zone Start % this low.
Incidentally, Crosby’s O-Zone Start isn’t just low, but insanely low. I’ll chuck that up next week, I think.
Does he call it Luongo underwear?
Co-Manager at Behind the Net
by Bettman's Nightmare on Dec 8, 2010 10:15 AM EST up reply actions
How do you explain the poor differential in light of the quality teammates and lesser competition?
This seems to point toward OV and not Boudreau.
His QoT is down from last year; look at the differential of Backstrom, Semin, and Knuble, and likewise their QoC. Really out of whack with the previous years; I honestly think Boudreau is trying to match them instead of just playing them, and it’s messing with their performance.
Does he call it Luongo underwear?
Co-Manager at Behind the Net
by Bettman's Nightmare on Dec 8, 2010 11:20 AM EST up reply actions
yeah, but isn’t QoT in part based on that player’s performance? e.g. the old russian 5 in detroit from the late 90s would all have a pretty awesome QoT. likewise, ovechkin’s own performance on his line brings up the rest of his teammates. especially if ovechkin is looked to be the driver of CORSI (which iirc QoT is based on).
It is, but that’s why I’m including O-Zone Starts alongside it. Ovechkin is out of the top 3 in QoT, and it could be b/c of his performance, but the O-Zone Starts also suggest he’s being used differently than the others.
Does he call it Luongo underwear?
Co-Manager at Behind the Net
by Bettman's Nightmare on Dec 8, 2010 12:02 PM EST up reply actions
Really, you’d be looking at the increase over the remaining zone starts for the year, not by how many he’s already had.
I understand that, but my point was even if his OZS were normal this year, they would only be 2-12 more as of right now. Consequently, I don’t think his change in usage is an explanation for his decrease in numbers thus far. If it persists throughout the year, then maybe it’ll be a different story, but I still think it’s too early right now to explain the drop in numbers as a factor of zone starts.
And yes, it’s kinda ridiculous that Crosby is putting up career numbers when his Corsi Rel QoC and zone start numbers indicate he’s playing tougher minutes than ever. Hopefully he keeps this up
Hockey Blogger at Pensburgh.com
I agree that it’s too early to chalk it simply up to zone starts, but it’s also too early to say he’s having an off-year. That being said, I’m more interested in the comparative; as I speak, he’s at 53%, only .2 above Jason Chimera (and .4 below Laich), whereas his fellow linemates are around 56%. When your spread is 10% across all qualifying forwards, 3% means a bit more.
Does he call it Luongo underwear?
Co-Manager at Behind the Net
by Bettman's Nightmare on Dec 8, 2010 11:44 AM EST up reply actions
What really caught my eye was that he’s never had a O-Zone Start % this low.
What caught my eye quickly is the zonefinish this year.
Subtracting his zonefinish from his expected zone finish, I get:
08: +0.97
09: +2.41
10: +2.52
11: -3.45
So it appears not only is he started more in the defensive end, he’s moving the wrong way for the first time in 4 years as well, and badly.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Dec 8, 2010 11:25 AM EST up reply actions
Thanks for this, George. Weird stuff.
Does he call it Luongo underwear?
Co-Manager at Behind the Net
by Bettman's Nightmare on Dec 8, 2010 11:58 AM EST up reply actions
I’ll put in a question mark because I don’t follow the caps:
Injury?
Guys his age don’t fall off a cliff. But guys playing his style get hurts sometimes.
The games that I’ve seen recently, he’s looked pretty healthy. And I don’t think he’s out of shape, either. But I have thought about it.
Does he call it Luongo underwear?
Co-Manager at Behind the Net
by Bettman's Nightmare on Dec 8, 2010 4:05 PM EST up reply actions
There were a couple of stories about him coming into camp and getting flat-out winded at the first couple of practices, which the beat reporters said they’d never seen before.
He’s also been shaking his right hand with the glove all season, since he took a Shea Weber two-hander on that hand during the preseason.
I’d buy injury, but he’s probably played enough games for enough minutes to get himself into cardiovascular shape at this point.
"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful" George E.P. Box
by Knee high to a duck on Dec 8, 2010 5:21 PM EST up reply actions
With the glove off*
He’s also been noticeably more floaty in his own zone and looks less willing to engage on the boards. I wonder if there’s another injury that’s gone unreported — it’s not like him at all.
"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful" George E.P. Box
by Knee high to a duck on Dec 8, 2010 5:24 PM EST up reply actions
Didn’t he have something happen to him in the playoffs?
Does he call it Luongo underwear?
Co-Manager at Behind the Net
by Bettman's Nightmare on Dec 8, 2010 6:14 PM EST up reply actions
Outside of losing, I mean.
Does he call it Luongo underwear?
Co-Manager at Behind the Net
by Bettman's Nightmare on Dec 8, 2010 6:14 PM EST up reply actions
Injury-wise? Not that I’m aware of. He played for the Team Russia World Championship squad immediately afterwards.
"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful" George E.P. Box
by Knee high to a duck on Dec 8, 2010 6:15 PM EST up reply actions
If you adjust goals-for as an OZF and goals-against as DZF, then he did even better than 2.52 last season — here’s the numbers for the Caps.
"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful" George E.P. Box
by Knee high to a duck on Dec 8, 2010 6:19 PM EST up reply actions

by 























