O Captain! My Captain!
Leadership in the NHL, and more specifically the captaincy, has functional and socio-psychological aspects to it. We (when I say "we", I mean fans) often talk about the importance of leadership, and how it can bring a team together or inspire a team to accomplish great things. The player with the "C" joins an exclusive club in any team's history, and former captains are occasionally brought back to either celebrate retired numbers or the anointing of a new captain.
Cassie McClellan at From the Rink was on the right track with her take on captaincy earlier in the current NHL season: it seems that teams elect their best scorers captain fairly frequently. I want to delve into that a little deeper, and take a glance at this year's captains and some interesting things about them.
McClellan's point got me thinking about the functional part of captaincy, that of a player allowed to talk to the referees on-ice. In this regard, a leading point-scorer might make sense; they will get quite a few minutes, and are likely to be kept on the team for longer, so they essentially would have more opportunities to carry out their duties for a team.
The socio-psychological aspect ("motivation", "leadership") could come with a leading point-scorer likely sticking around; there is a possibility they could know their teammates better, and be the "welcome wagon" for newcomers. Beyond that, a captain's approach varies greatly, whether they inspire by words or actions, whether the team responds to words or actions, whether the captain is a representative of the team to coaches, media, etc. Looking at this year's crop of captains, there's no less variation in leadership approaches; but there's a lack of variation in other things.
An extraordinary number of this year's captains are either a.) 1st round picks, b.) players acquired via "big" trades*, and/or c.) players acquired via "big" signings**. In these three scenarios, GMs and the players alike are under pressure to justify the means of their acquisition; they are also expected to stick around awhile and bring great things to the organization. I highly doubt, though, that this would automatically make a person qualified for the captaincy, but it sure does seem to happen often:
Team --- Captain --- Round Drafted --- "Big" Trade? --- "Big" Signing?
Anaheim Ducks --- Ryan Getzlaf --- 1 --- N --- N
Atlanta Thrashers --- Andrew Ladd --- 1 --- N --- N
Boston Bruins --- Zdeno Chara --- 3 --- N --- Y
Buffalo Sabres --- Craig Rivet --- 3 --- N --- N
Calgary Flames --- Jarome Iginla --- 1 --- Y --- N
Carolina Hurricanes --- Eric Staal --- 1 --- N --- N
Chicago Blackhawks --- Jonathan Toews --- 1 --- N --- N
Colorado Avalanche --- Adam Foote --- 2 --- Y --- N
Columbus Blue Jackets --- Rick Nash --- 1 --- N --- N
Dallas Stars --- Brenden Morrow --- 1 --- N --- N
Detroit Red Wings --- Nicklas Lidstrom --- 3 --- N --- N
Edmonton Oilers --- Shawn Horcoff --- 4 --- N --- N
Florida Panthers --- Bryan McCabe --- 2 --- N --- N
Los Angeles Kings --- Dustin Brown --- 1 --- N --- N
Minnesota Wild --- Mikko Koivu --- 1 --- N --- N
Montreal Canadiens --- Brian Gionta --- 3 --- N --- Y
Nashville Predators --- Shea Weber --- 2 --- N --- N
New Jersey Devils --- Jamie Langenbrunner --- 2 --- Y --- N
New York Islanders --- Doug Weight --- 2 --- N --- N
New York Rangers --- Chris Drury --- 3 --- N --- Y
Ottawa Senators --- Daniel Alfredsson --- 6 --- N --- N
Philadelphia Flyers --- Mike Richards --- 1 --- N --- N
Phoenix Coyotes --- Shane Doan --- 1 --- N --- N
Pittsburgh Penguins --- Sidney Crosby --- 1 --- N --- N
San Jose Sharks --- Joe Thornton --- 1 --- Y --- N
St. Louis Blues --- Eric Brewer --- 1 --- Y --- N
Tampa Bay Lightning --- Vincent Lecavalier --- 1 --- N --- N
Toronto Maple Leafs --- Dion Phaneuf --- 1 --- Y --- N
Vancouver Canucks --- Henrik Sedin --- 1 --- N --- N
Washington Capitals --- Alex Ovechkin --- 1 --- N --- N
This is not to mention the number of players on this list that are being paid north of $5 million/year now, instead of simply being acquired on that expensive of a contract. Had I included those, Horcoff, McCabe, and Lidstrom would be in the mix as well. Had I also dropped the contract value to $4.5 million/year, we'd be including Alfredsson and Weber, leaving only Rivet and Weight behind. As is, 23 of the 30 captains fall into the 3 criteria I established above, and we can either choose to accept that GMs are really good at drafting, trading for, or paying for leadership, or we can suggest that perhaps some of these players are gaining the captaincy even if they aren't true leaders.
More on this later...
*I'm identifying a "big" trade as a trade where that player is used to either acquire a first-line player or 1st round pick or are expected to be a first-line player in return for perceived first-line value.
**I'm identifying a "big" signing as where a player receives $5 million/year or greater.
22 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
and we can either choose to accept that GMs are really good at drafting, trading for, or paying for leadership, or we can suggest that perhaps some of these players are gaining the captaincy even if they aren’t true leaders.
Does your suggestion surprise anyone? The concept of Captain as Leader in hockey, to me, is hugely overrated. Because what, really, is the Captain’s role? Coming up with the “clutch” play? “Motivating” players in some intangible way (“speaking up in the locker room”? “giving that extra 10%”? “buckling down when we need it most”?). There are likely plenty of good captains on teams that don’t win, and plenty of bad captains on teams that do.
Quick, who are the best leaders in hockey history? People will throw out the obvious names – Messier, Yzerman, Stevens. Who just happen to be huge impact players on teams that won a lot. But how come someone like Mario Lemieux doesn’t get more credit for being a great captain?
The problem with determining a “good” Captains starts with the very the near impossibility of determining the qualities you’re trying to measure.
I would be interested if the way captains are selected has changed over time. My guess is that as hockey (and sports in general) become more big business, the captain goes to the “best” player, rather than some the more nebulous concept of “leader”.
Glen Sather is a Hockey Genius.
http://twitter.com/ThGeneralissimo
http://twitter.com/poplosertwit
I would be interested if the way captains are selected has changed over time.
And that, sir, will be forthcoming.
Does he call it Luongo underwear?
Co-Manager at Behind the Net
by Bettman's Nightmare on Dec 29, 2010 10:10 AM EST up reply actions
Well, I think Mario gets ample credit as a leader.
Buying (a piece of ) his old franchise, bringing them back to respectability, not to mention practically adopting Sydney Crosby… the list goes on. The guy gets plenty of accolades, and is one of the most respected figures in the game.
Your point stands, however, that some leaders will never get the credit they deserve, and though perhaps Mario Lemieux isn’t under-valued, he isn’t really the issue anyway. I apologize for my nit-pickery, and, as a side note, I proffer Mats Sundin as a leader who never got the credit he deserved while playing in Toronto.
I think that perhaps we need to think of a Captain more in terms of a mid-management leader in a regular office – especially when the player is GM or Coach-appointed. No real authority, not necessarily the most popular guy at a party (quite the opposite, frankly), but is usually better compensated than his peers, based on his tenure and/or previous track record. The Captain is probably just a player who is known to tow the line and have a good work ethic.
What I’m getting at is that perhaps we’re putting too much stock in the “C”. I don’t know if they’re necessarily the leaders we always think of them as. When I played, it’s true that I held some of my captains in high regard, but I also thought a few of my captains were d-bags.
Oh, you better believe that's a paddling.
Just throwing this out for what it’s worth … when I lost the captaincy on my team from my 13 year old season going in to my age 14 season, the coach said that I was still going to be a leader on the team, but he wanted to challenge our best player to step up.
I completely acknowledge this could be simply sugar coating for a 14 year old getting demoted.
At the same time, it does present an alternative method of using the captaincy, which is similar to what you’re stating. Perhaps, rather than assigning a captaincy based on past performance and current leadership abilities, coaches / GMs are doing it in the hope of developing leadership abilities / performance in their best players?
This could help to explain how young some people seem to be when they become captain of their team (Toews and Crosby spring to mind). It also fits with the idea of making high draft picks, big signings, or big trade guys the captain as well as they’re likely to be the best player. It’s not quite the same thing as using the captaincy to justify a trade, but it is a similar type of motivation.
Jarome Iginla was acquired in a trade for Joe Nieuwendyk, isn’t that a big trade?
Nieuwendyk was 28, had played in the All-Star game the previous season, and was 8th in even-strength goal scoring.
Totally dropped the ball on that one, thanks Rob. Here I was patting myself on the back for remembering that Sedin was part of a big trade to get the #3 pick…
Does he call it Luongo underwear?
Co-Manager at Behind the Net
by Bettman's Nightmare on Dec 29, 2010 11:33 AM EST up reply actions
Actually, Henrik Sedin was drafted 3rd overall, which was Vancouver’s natural selection. Technically it was Daniel Sedin who was drafted 2nd overall, acquired from Atlanta.
P.S. This type of nit-picking is probably why I have so many gosh-darn friends.
by Rob Vollman on Dec 29, 2010 1:56 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Blast!
Does he call it Luongo underwear?
Co-Manager at Behind the Net
by Bettman's Nightmare on Dec 29, 2010 2:17 PM EST up reply actions
and Brian Burke needed to make two other trades to finally end up with the 2nd overall pick: one to acquire the 4th overall from Chicago (for McCabe and following year’s 1st round), another to acquire the 1st overall from Tampa Bay (for the 4th overall and later round picks). After that, Vancouver traded the 1st overall pick to Atlanta for the 2nd overall pick. The key was that GMs at the time valued Stefan and Brendl highly and would not use both 1st and 2nd overall picks on the twins, so Vancouver would get to draft both twins after securing the 4th overall pick.
Haha, Stefan being a bust wasn’t his only big miss…
Does he call it Luongo underwear?
Co-Manager at Behind the Net
by Bettman's Nightmare on Dec 29, 2010 3:46 PM EST up reply actions
And McCabe may not have been acquired via a “big” trade, though he was acquired by trade, and Florida may not have signed him to that big contract, but he is a player on a big contract expected to play big minutes for them, that was acquired from elsewhere.
Puck Worlds: Chasing Pucks from here to Turku.
For Twitter Updates on Puck Worlds, follow @puckworlds. For updates plus additional witty banter from yours truly, follow @saskhab.
Yeah, he kind of slipped through the cracks in my criteria..he was also 1 round away from being a 1st round pick. For a little while, I thought that I could spin it by saying that he wasn’t acquired as the top D for the Panthers, but maybe top pairing; I decided if I was stretching that much, it’d probably be better just to leave him out.
Does he call it Luongo underwear?
Co-Manager at Behind the Net
by Bettman's Nightmare on Dec 29, 2010 3:42 PM EST up reply actions
An extraordinary number of this year’s captains are either a.) 1st round picks, b.) players acquired via “big” trades*, and/or c.) players acquired via “big” signings**.
I feel I should point out that a large number of NHL players at large meet at least one of these criteria. Even more if we leave out the ones that aren’t really ‘regular’ NHL players, and those with less than three years experience.
I've been looking at the sky
Care to quantify that?
Does he call it Luongo underwear?
Co-Manager at Behind the Net
by Bettman's Nightmare on Dec 30, 2010 1:43 AM EST up reply actions
I would try but I’m on the road the next couple of days. Also: I’m not the one who said “extraordinary”…
I've been looking at the sky
by Back In Black on Dec 30, 2010 8:01 AM EST up reply actions
I’ll just have to figure out what a “regular” NHL player is…
Does he call it Luongo underwear?
Co-Manager at Behind the Net
by Bettman's Nightmare on Dec 30, 2010 10:01 AM EST up reply actions
Yeah, that’s a sticky one. If you want to know what I meant, I simply wanted to exclude players who play very few minutes per game and those who are healthy scratches on a non-infrequent basis.
My point is that if you want to make the claim that captains are being chosen for PR reasons, the 1st round pick / splashy acquisition criteria are only evidence if the proportion is significantly different than the proportion of players in the eligible pool (multi-year career and established role on the team/in the league). The anecdotal evidence is certainly there, but so are the counter-examples (e.g. Andrew Ladd).
I've been looking at the sky
Ah, reply fail. Gotta get going…
I've been looking at the sky
by Back In Black on Dec 30, 2010 10:30 AM EST up reply actions
Wasn't Chara a third?
I know for a fact the Isles didn’t get him in the first round…
known far and wide for stat-fu and irking people
Lighthouse Hockey - a beacon of greatness on the rocky coast of sports blog mediocrity
"isn’t it amazingly simple to use the link pop-up?" - JPinVA
forehead slap Correctamundo.
Does he call it Luongo underwear?
Co-Manager at Behind the Net
by Bettman's Nightmare on Jan 4, 2011 5:54 PM EST up reply actions

by 

















