Not a Bang But a Whimper
In a career reaching into four decades, Mike Modano has built an impressive resume: over 550 goals, 800 assists, one Stanley Cup, and the reputation of an "every-minute" forward with point-per-game skills in a period when the former was rarely recognized and the latter hard to come by.
Now, we are coming to the end of his career. We watch as he moves closer to home and wears an alien uniform, wanting old to become new one more time, but instead it has just gotten older. Modano isn't playing the toughest opponents anymore; in fact, he is now playing the weakest. Wrist surgery has him rehabbing hard, trying to get one last playoff run, a chance to sew up the loose ends and make sure he can end it on his terms.
We demand this of our Hall of Famers, and he better get in.
Because, unfortunately, there are a lot of arguments to the contrary. He has one 50-goal season to his credit, one Cup win (and a controversial one, at that), 7 All-Star Games, but zero major trophies, zero 100-point seasons; the fact that he's the highest scoring U.S.-born NHLer might be enough on its own, or his place on the 1996 World Cup and 2002 Olympic teams. In a time when 500 goals is less than enough, we have to dig like this to find pinnacles in a career that was just consistently higher than most.
Stats tell us more, like the fact that he was relied upon to play in every situation, even when the Stars were flooded with defensive stalwarts like Jere Lehtinen, Guy Carbonneau, and Brian Skrudland. He was that good, and he and Lehtinen formed the core of some of the more eye-opening numbers of the Dead Puck Era. The success of the Devils was pretty sobering, but then Ed Belfour tied together two sub-2.00 GAA seasons, actually topping (or is it "bottoming"?) Brodeur in 1997-98. After that, Modano and company made Marty Turco into a star, as Turco himself had two sub-2.00 GAA seasons. Four sub-2.00 GAA seasons, across two goaltenders and seven seasons, are not a function of great goaltending, but a great defense at work.
GVT likes him even more; among forwards with 1,000+ games in NHL history, Modano's per-game defensive GVT ranks 13th, ahead of Doug Gilmour, Rod Brind'Amour, Dave Taylor, Jason Arnott, and even Bob Gainey.
Modano fits within the battle for legitimacy in a time where we constantly debate what is Hall-of-Fame-worthy. He needs to give a pound of flesh because the boxcar stats don't hold him "elite" enough; he needs one more Cup because 16 wins this year, this time around, are more important than 1,500 games of top-flite hockey. We want him to do it, because great for longer makes it easier to decide. And winning a Cup can truly make you look great. But what if he was elite all along, and we were looking in the wrong place?
In history, there are meteors, and there are prolonged figures; I believe strongly in meteors, as their intensity truly makes us think differently about a particular time and place.
But prolonged figures are less fire and more glowing coal, confined but constant, reminding us that long after the flame has died out, it was firing our engines and warming our air.
Let's make sure Mike Modano gets into the Hall.
20 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
If Modano doesn’t get in, he would be by far the best player not in the Hall. His career was even better than Gilmour’s or Oates’, two other guys who should be in. He had 1500 points (with playoffs) in a low-scoring era. I think he should be a slam dunk, but I don’t put too much stock in the Hall voters, who have been pretty erratic (Clark Gillies in? Bernie Federko in? Mark Howe and Gilmour out?)
Also: Where’s Phil Housley? Not in the Hall, that’s where.
Though Mark Howe is the most unexplainable one.
Mike Weber: Free to roam the ice and take stupid boarding penalties once more.
Everything wrong with the Sabres is Drew Stafford's fault.
Anti-American?
Modano, Housley and Howe are all American-born. Modano’s name is even pronounced differently that Giordano – in the US they prounced the “dan” part like “dawn”. It sounds like they’re talking about Madonna. And in a tv interview once I remember it bugged Phil Housley that he was pronounced Hoosley while playing in Winnipeg and Calgary.
But I digress.
Modano: 1367 points
Howe: 1246 points (including WHA)
Housley: 1232 points
… all more than Federko and double Gillies.
I’m glad Ben used the caveat “American-born” when describing Modano, or people would have screamed Brett Hull before you could even post the story.
P.S. Guyle Fielder is actually the highest scoring American-born player, with 1771 points . You should have specified NHL! :)
by Rob Vollman on Dec 16, 2010 10:33 AM EST up reply actions
Is my journalistic integrity compromised if I changed it to “U.S.-born NHLer” just now? Maybe that’s why MSM people don’t like bloggers…
Does he call it Luongo underwear?
Co-Manager at Behind the Net
by Bettman's Nightmare on Dec 16, 2010 11:36 AM EST up reply actions
I never heard anyone call him Hoosley in Winnipeg. Mostly we complained that his take on defense was standing in front of your own net, nowhere near an opponent, with his stick in the air.
I think I have 2 or 3 hockey cards of him in that defensive posture.
Puck Worlds: Chasing Pucks from here to Turku.
For Twitter Updates on Puck Worlds, follow @puckworlds. For updates plus additional witty banter from yours truly, follow @saskhab.
What really blew me away was when I realized the other day that he has received no major trophies (outside of the Cup).
Does he call it Luongo underwear?
Co-Manager at Behind the Net
by Bettman's Nightmare on Dec 16, 2010 11:57 AM EST up reply actions
I think we do need to realize that his bid is going to be very complicated; think about all the people whose boxcars are very close to his: Dave Andreychuk, Joe Nieuwendyk, Mark Recchi, Jeremy Roenick, Keith Tkachuk…
Does he call it Luongo underwear?
Co-Manager at Behind the Net
by Bettman's Nightmare on Dec 16, 2010 11:42 AM EST reply actions
…Pierre Turgeon, Brendan Shanahan; heck you also have Eric Lindros and Peter Forsberg coming into the picture. Sergei Makarov is still out there, Chris Osgood will be there, as will Mats Sundin, Alexander Mogilny, maybe even Sergei Fedorov, Pavel Bure, or Paul Kariya (the last two if you’re looking at point-per-game).
Does he call it Luongo underwear?
Co-Manager at Behind the Net
by Bettman's Nightmare on Dec 16, 2010 11:53 AM EST up reply actions
I think the advantage Modano has over all those players (in the eyes of the voters), is that he was “the franchise” for one of the best organization’s of that era.
Most other guys bounced around to at least a few teams during their prime. But I think Modano being seen as the guy for the Stars during a period where they went to the Cup Finals 3 times, winning once, will carry some weight.
Not saying it should be the deciding factor, just saying I think that it probably will be.
I can definitely see that influencing the vote, as long as they truly recognize how good Dallas was in that period. If they only go by Cups won, they are missing out on the second-best dynasty in a tough Western Conference from the mid-1990s to the mid-2000s.
Does he call it Luongo underwear?
Co-Manager at Behind the Net
by Bettman's Nightmare on Dec 16, 2010 2:32 PM EST up reply actions
Fair point — from 1995-96 to 2005-06, Dallas and Colorado were virtually swapping spots with Detroit atop the West — and Dallas’s lows (1995-96, 2001-02) were lower than Colorado’s. But their highs (1997-98, 1998-99, 1999-00, 2002-03) were even better than the Wings — how about tied for 2nd?
Does he call it Luongo underwear?
Co-Manager at Behind the Net
by Bettman's Nightmare on Dec 16, 2010 10:01 PM EST up reply actions
Damn you for making me hope for the Wings to win another cup.
I’m going to go shower now.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
Frivolous Ornamentation
by Karina on Dec 16, 2010 1:03 PM EST reply actions
Vote 'no' on Modano
The liberal admission standards of the HHOF have, in my opinion, always reflected a degree of discredit on the NHL and the Hall. To add Mike Modano, a good but never great player, would be yet another peice of evidence suggesting that the Hall rewards mediocrity and the much revered “longevity” of players.
Modano has spent most of the last half of his career (effectively from 2000 forward) as a middling player with little on his resume to reflect a hall of fame career. Contrary to the assertion of ’Bettman’s Nightmare", Modano did not play only in a dead puck era; rather his prime playing years were spent at least partially in the golden age of Gretzky, Lemieux, etc. His paltry point totals, especially comapred to the titans of his era, suggest to me a very different assessment of Modano’s career than the one presented by Bettman’s nightmare.
Finally, the HHOF would do far better to revisit its criminal omission of foregn-born players, particularly those hailing from the former Soviet Union, than waste a perfectly good induction ceremony on an above average American player. The simple fact is that the United States has never produced a first-class hockey star, at any level of the game, a fact that will remain regardless of the Hall’s putative inclusion of Modano. The bias against the Russian game, conspicuous even today in the Crosby-Ovechkin debate, has poisoned the HHOF’s selection process and undermined its legitimacy. Modano’s induction is simply more proof of the HHOF’s failures.
His paltry point totals, especially comapred to the titans of his era, suggest to me a very different assessment of Modano’s career than the one presented by Bettman’s nightmare.
Funny, an assessment using point totals is precisely the reason why HHOF has inducted some questionable players. It could also be one of the reasons Russian players have been snubbed.
Does he call it Luongo underwear?
Co-Manager at Behind the Net
by Bettman's Nightmare on Dec 16, 2010 6:40 PM EST up reply actions
Finally, the HHOF would do far better to revisit its criminal omission of foregn-born players
Modano is foreign-born. The HHoF is Canadian.
particularly those hailing from the former Soviet Union
The HHoF isn’t America-focused, it’s NHL-focused. The omission is ALL other leagues, not just European leagues. Granted the omission of Soviet stars is the most glaring, but even more North Americans have been left out due to the HHoF’s NHL bias.
The simple fact is that the United States has never produced a first-class hockey star, at any level of the game
Hobey Baker was probably the greatest player of his era. “Mr. Zero” Frank Brimsek was arguably the most dominant goalie of his generation. Guyle Fielder would rank up with the Soviet players as among the best non-NHL players of all-time. Depending on your definition of “first class” – Chris Chelios, Brian Leetch and Mark Howe are all arguably among the world’s best defensemen in their prime. Even if you disqualify Brett Hull as being produced in Canada, there are plenty of Americans that legitimately belong in the HHoF.
I’ll leave the defense of Modano to someone else, and I’ll leave the “Bias against Russian game” and “Crosby-Ovechkin” debate to someone else, but suffice it to say that all I’ve ever heard growing up in the 80s was how awesome Russia was – even when Canada beat them. And if there’s a bias against Ovechkin, it’s based on the lack of his team’s success throughout his career, not his nationality.
I find this argument to lack merit. The HHOF has whatever standards it has; it’s not for you or I to decide where the threshold should be, all we ask is that it be applied in a consistent manner. Modano is easily as good or better as most of the recent HHOF inductees. Like it or not, longevity is part of a player’s impact; not so much that it invalidates the career of an Orr or a Bossy, but there’s something to be said about being a quality player until the age of 40.
Modano has paltry point totals? Compares to who? Normalize for league scoring levels, you’ll find Modano’s totals, regular season + playoffs, superior to Gilmour, Fedorov, Robitaille, Turgeon, Roenick, ,etc. Nobody’s saying Modano was another Yzerman or Sakic, but frankly by those standards you’d be inducting 5 players per decade.
As for the omission of foreign-born players, the problem is a lack of comparability. Even within the NHL we have trouble comparing objectively. Who can say how well Alexander Yakushev would have done in the NHL? The obvious ones (Fetisov, Larionov, Kharlamov, Tretiak) are in. Most of the best Europeans of the last 30 years played in the NHL anyway. I see no bias in against the Russian game; as Rob said, all I’ve ever head is how awesome the Russians are. It’s a good thing that anti-Russian bias prevented Ovechkin from winning those Hart and Lindsay trophies, Malkin from his Conn Smythe (against Crosby, no less!) and Datsyuk from a billion Selkes.

by 
















