Advanced Metric Frequently Asked Question #1: A quick spin through +/- statistics at Behind the Net

USA TODAY Sports

How can we improve on traditional +/- in hockey? A brief introduction to Behind the Net's advanced +/- statistics.


The concept of Plus/Minus is not a new one - the Montreal Canadiens started collecting it 50 years ago, and it became an official stat when the NHL expanded to 12 teams in 1967-68. But +/- doesn't tell us everything about a player - someone who's on the ice for five goals for and five goals against gets the same +/- as someone who's on the ice for no goals. The statistical reports at Behind the Net allow you to distinguish between those two players.

After the jump - who was on the ice for the most and fewest goals, for and against, at 5-on-5 in 2008-09:

The owner of the highest positive rate is not surprising in the least, while the worst negative rate belongs to a Phoenix Coyotes player:

Highest Goals For Rate: Pavel Datsyuk +4.28/60 minutes - complete list

Highest Goals Against Rate: Enver Lisin -3.81/60 minutes - complete list

And what about +/- per 60 minutes? Michael Ryder, +2.18/60 minutes - complete list

One of the weaknesses of traditional +/- is that it tends to favor players on good teams - Bruins Ryder, Blake Wheeler, David Krejci, Phil Kessel and Marc Savard were all in the top ten in the league, which is not surprising given that Boston was the highest-scoring team at 5-on-5 in the NHL. At the same time, it penalizes players on bad teams - six New York Islanders were in the bottom 10.

We can make a small improvement on +/- by subtracting the +/- when a player is off the ice from it. That is, if a player was +1 goal per 60 minutes on the ice and his team was even when he was off, he ends up appearing the same as a guy who was even on the ice while his teammates were -1 per 60 minutes. It's not perfect, but it does make an adjustment for how good a player's teammates were. This statistic has several names - relative +/-, On-Ice/Off-Ice +/-, or simply "Rating", as I've called it on the stats page.

With this adjustment, Pavel Datsyuk still looks good, but Patrik Berglund, who had a good season on an ok team, vaults to the top. The Bruins are still there, a bit further down, while good players on bad teams, like Mark Streit, get pulled up. Complete list

The most egregious problem with this statistic shows up at the bottom of the list - the bottom four were Jay Pandolfo, Rob Niedermayer, Sammy Pahlsson and Travis Moen, who have all been sought after during their careers for their defensive ability. I'll discuss how we assess the performance of defensive forwards in a future post.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

Join Arctic Ice Hockey

You must be a member of Arctic Ice Hockey to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Arctic Ice Hockey. You should read them.

Join Arctic Ice Hockey

You must be a member of Arctic Ice Hockey to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Arctic Ice Hockey. You should read them.

Spinner

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9355_tracker